fix(serverless): update config properties

[G-Rath]

Please fill in this template.

• Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
• Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
• Add or edit tests to reflect the change.
• Follow the advice from the readme.
• Avoid common mistakes.
• Run npm test <package to test>.

Select one of these and delete the others:

If changing an existing definition:

• Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes:
  • serverless.yml
  • Deprecation of awsKmsKeyArn
  • unresolvedVariablesNotificationMode
• If this PR brings the type definitions up to date with a new version of the JS library, update the version number in the header.

[typescript-bot]

@G-Rath Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

• serverless on npm, on unpkg

Code Reviews

Because you edited one package and updated the tests (👏), I can help you merge this PR once someone else signs off on it.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• ❌ Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners, DT maintainers or others

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

Inactive

This PR has been inactive for 18 days — it is still unreviewed!

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 51130,
  "author": "G-Rath",
  "headCommitOid": "6357935a79bc97f61b1ce15a27a7c83bbe44d2d5",
  "lastPushDate": "2021-02-16T18:53:58.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2021-02-16T18:53:58.000Z",
  "maintainerBlessed": false,
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "serverless",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/serverless/plugins/aws/provider/awsProvider.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/serverless/serverless-tests.ts",
          "kind": "test"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "hassankhan",
        "JonathanWilbur",
        "a-pavlenko",
        "fredericbarthelet",
        "bryan-hunter",
        "thomasaribart"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Well-liked by everyone"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @hassankhan @JonathanWilbur @a-pavlenko @fredericbarthelet @bryan-hunter @ThomasAribart — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

[typescript-bot]

@G-Rath The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

[typescript-bot]

👋 Hi there! I’ve run some quick measurements against master and your PR. These metrics should help the humans reviewing this PR gauge whether it might negatively affect compile times or editor responsiveness for users who install these typings.

Let’s review the numbers, shall we?

Comparison details 📊

	master	#51130	diff
Batch compilation
Memory usage (MiB)	42.5	46.0	+8.3%
Type count	3217	3532	+10%
Assignability cache size	316	346	+9%
Language service
Samples taken	568	591	+4%
Identifiers in tests	568	591	+4%
getCompletionsAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	97.3	99.6	+2.4%
Mean CV	14.4%	14.3%
Worst duration (ms)	160.3	148.2	-7.6%
Worst identifier	Type	Type
getQuickInfoAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	102.5	102.5	0.0%
Mean CV	11.8%	12.2%
Worst duration (ms)	171.3	149.4	-12.8%
Worst identifier	testFunction	events

It looks like nothing changed too much. I won’t post performance data again unless it gets worse.

[typescript-bot]

@G-Rath The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

[typescript-bot]

@G-Rath The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

[typescript-bot]

@G-Rath The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

[typescript-bot]

@G-Rath The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

[typescript-bot]

Re-ping @hassankhan, @JonathanWilbur, @a-pavlenko, @fredericbarthelet, @bryan-hunter, @ThomasAribart:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!

[typescript-bot]

It has been more than two weeks and this PR still has no reviews.

I'll bump it to the DT maintainer queue. Thank you for your patience, @G-Rath.

(Ping @hassankhan, @JonathanWilbur, @a-pavlenko, @fredericbarthelet, @bryan-hunter, @ThomasAribart.)

[typescript-bot]

I just published @types/serverless@1.78.21 to npm.