Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DO NOT MERGE] CXSPA-6939 (PoC) Handling breaking changes related to SSR Error Handling #18789
base: epic/ssr-error-handling
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[DO NOT MERGE] CXSPA-6939 (PoC) Handling breaking changes related to SSR Error Handling #18789
Changes from 2 commits
84e5f45
2e6ab07
f8143ee
785f958
398d7f2
8e05980
b2eb19b
cba8cbc
a08e7df
a8f2809
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry. I don't get the problem - what a breaking change we have? TS Type? Behavior?
And how we're mitigating it?
And if introducing any temporary solutions (e.g. deprecated things), when will we remove them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As we discussed, usage of a new type in the constructor or making the constructor's params required provide breaking changes.
Action points for such cases:
ErrorActionType
typeerror/payload
paramundefined
(assignnew Error
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FeatureToggles for the win. It's easy, simple, documented.
Importing extra modules by customers is an extra overhead. It should be required only in cases when bundlesize of importing this module by default would be considerable.