Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ivy):
ViewRef.rootNodes
returns rootNodes from child views as well #33457fix(ivy):
ViewRef.rootNodes
returns rootNodes from child views as well #33457Changes from 2 commits
8d371fa
dc424ff
6a4f953
7cfeec9
f27a91e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see a test for the
TNodeType.IcuContainer
in the series of node type checks. If I recall properly ICU containers "behave" similarly to<ng-container>
s. I'm not sure if we can bump into ICU containers here, but:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I would add an assert to verify that we don't bump into
tNode
beingTNodeType.View
(just for completeness, to make sure that we are not missing handling of any TNode type).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Icu
node to show up here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that this assert is correct for 2 reasons:
TView
defined by this<ng-template>
and not inserted into aViewContainerRef
asked on this<ng-template>
;TView
null
when the definition is empty<ng-template></ng-template>
, AFAIKThere is a confusion between an embedded view defintion and the the inserted instance here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we add few more test cases:
<ng-container>
s at the root of an embedded view;<ng-container>
- I'm not sure if we can have them at the root of a view;ViewContainerRef
at the root of a view (you've got a case where a VCRef is asked on a container);There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added test cases
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't seen a test for the case where a
ViewContainerRef
is injected on a regular element.