Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(mergeSchemas): Prevent custom resolvers from being overwritten by default resolvers #4455

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

borisno2
Copy link

@borisno2 borisno2 commented May 12, 2022

🚨 IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.

Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of the pull request.

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Related #4367

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Screenshots/Sandbox (if appropriate/relevant):

Adding links to sandbox or providing screenshots can help us understand more about this PR and take action on it as appropriate

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • yarn test
  • Create Schema and custom resolver, pass in schema and resolver to mergeSchema to ensure the resolver overrides the schema
  • written new test should override resolver in schema with resolver passed into config

Test Environment:

  • OS: MacOS
  • @graphql-tools/schema:
  • NodeJS: v16.15.0

Checklist:

  • I have followed the CONTRIBUTING doc and the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests and linter rules pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 12, 2022

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a6d2283

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 14 packages
Name Type
@graphql-tools/schema Major
@graphql-tools/batch-delegate Patch
@graphql-tools/delegate Patch
graphql-tools Patch
@graphql-tools/load Patch
@graphql-tools/mock Patch
@graphql-tools/stitch Patch
@graphql-tools/stitching-directives Patch
@graphql-tools/wrap Patch
@graphql-tools/links Patch
@graphql-tools/url-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/node-require Patch
federation-benchmark Patch
@graphql-tools/prisma-loader Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 12, 2022

@borisno2 is attempting to deploy a commit to the The Guild Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@borisno2
Copy link
Author

Replaces #4368

@Urigo
Copy link
Collaborator

Urigo commented May 12, 2022

@borisno2 can you also add test cases that cover these behaviours?

@borisno2
Copy link
Author

Done @Urigo

See should override resolver in schema with resolver passed into config

Fails on current code and passes on new code

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 12, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
graphql-tools ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview May 12, 2022 at 9:12AM (UTC)

@ardatan
Copy link
Owner

ardatan commented May 17, 2022

@borisno2 I couldn't edit your PR so I created a new one with some additional breaking changes since we are already going to release a major :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants