Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cli: unnzip Cypress using unzip utility on Linux #5851

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2019

Conversation

flotwig
Copy link
Contributor

@flotwig flotwig commented Dec 2, 2019

User facing changelog

  • Cypress will attempt to use the unzip binary during cypress install before trying the slower, Node.js-based unzipping method.

Additional details

  • time spent unzipping (unzipMs):
    • with node.js unzipping: 25667ms
    • with unzip: 5320ms
    • will definitely help people with slow CI
  • technically, unzip could work on macOS or windows, but it's probably not going to exist on either so I'm not sure we should even attempt it

How has the user experience changed?

cypress install is much faster

PR Tasks

  • Have tests been added/updated?
    • not sure how to test - existing ditto stuff doesn't have a test
    • I have written a test for a situation when unzip is unavailable, but had to skip it - it was causing weird verify_spec failures
  • Has the original issue been tagged with a release in ZenHub?

@cypress-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cypress-bot bot commented Dec 2, 2019

Thanks for the contribution! Below are some guidelines Cypress uses when doing PR reviews.

  • Please write [WIP] in the title of your Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review - someone will review your PR as soon as the [WIP] is removed.
  • Please familiarize yourself with the PR Review Checklist and feel free to make updates on your PR based on these guidelines.

PR Review Checklist

If any of the following requirements can't be met, leave a comment in the review selecting 'Request changes', otherwise 'Approve'.

User Experience

  • The feature/bugfix is self-documenting from within the product.
  • The change provides the end user with a way to fix their problem (no dead ends).

Functionality

  • The code works and performs its intended function with the correct logic.
  • Performance has been factored in (for example, the code cleans up after itself to not cause memory leaks).
  • The code guards against edge cases and invalid input and has tests to cover it.

Maintainability

  • The code is readable (too many nested 'if's are a bad sign).
  • Names used for variables, methods, etc, clearly describe their function.
  • The code is easy to understood and there are relevant comments explaining.
  • New algorithms are documented in the code with link(s) to external docs (flowcharts, w3c, chrome, firefox).
  • There are comments containing link(s) to the addressed issue (in tests and code).

Quality

  • The change does not reimplement code.
  • There's not a module from the ecosystem that should be used instead.
  • There is no redundant or duplicate code.
  • There are no irrelevant comments left in the code.
  • Tests are testing the code’s intended functionality in the best way possible.

Internal

  • The original issue has been tagged with a release in ZenHub.

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Dec 2, 2019



Test summary

3517 0 45 0


Run details

Project cypress
Status Passed
Commit 7328ea3
Started Dec 3, 2019 12:38 AM
Ended Dec 3, 2019 12:42 AM
Duration 03:51 💡
OS Linux Debian - 9.8
Browser Multiple

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️


This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

@@ -113,13 +157,20 @@ const unzip = ({ zipFilePath, installDir, progress }) => {
case 'darwin':
return unzipWithOsx()
case 'linux':
return unzipWithUnzipTool()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but will every Linux system include unzip?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, but it silently falls back to node.js unzip if it fails


const sp = cp.spawn('unzip', ['-o', zipFilePath, '-d', installDir])

sp.on('error', unzipWithNode)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, I see you fall to Node in that case

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ha // f-it just unzip with node

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i believe that is your comment 😆

@bahmutov
Copy link
Contributor

bahmutov commented Dec 2, 2019

shell we start adding unzip to our docker images?

@flotwig
Copy link
Contributor Author

flotwig commented Dec 2, 2019

shell we start adding unzip to our docker images?

cypress/browsers:node12.0.0-chrome73 seems to have it already, so it might already be in others

@bahmutov
Copy link
Contributor

bahmutov commented Dec 3, 2019

I added a sample test, but what really bothers me is that it works by itself, yet when all the tests run together - there are 4 tests in verify that fail with weird errors, seems like some promise somewhere is left hanging

@bahmutov
Copy link
Contributor

bahmutov commented Dec 3, 2019

This is pretty sweet - this PR unzips on Circle in 21 seconds, while develop branch runs same job in 38 seconds.

Copy link
Contributor

@bahmutov bahmutov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this PR and thinks it achieves its purpose. I wish we did another pass at refactoring and moved each "unzip" function into own functions we can spy on / stub from tests. Right now they all live in shared single large function, but that's ok for now, keeps change to a minimum

@bahmutov bahmutov changed the title Unzip Cypress using unzip utility on Linux cli: unnzip Cypress using unzip utility on Linux Dec 3, 2019
@bahmutov bahmutov merged commit 02515fe into develop Dec 3, 2019
santoshyadavdev pushed a commit to santoshyadavdev/cypress that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
* unzip using 'unzip' utility on linux

* add example unzip test
avallete pushed a commit to avallete/cypress that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2019
* unzip using 'unzip' utility on linux

* add example unzip test
@flotwig flotwig deleted the issue-3803-linux-native-unzip branch January 24, 2022 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"Unzipping Cypress" takes four minutes
2 participants