Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NullCheckOnMutableProperty] Created rule for when a null-check is performed on a mutable property #4353

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions detekt-core/src/main/resources/default-detekt-config.yml
Expand Up @@ -575,6 +575,8 @@ potential-bugs:
MissingWhenCase:
active: true
allowElseExpression: true
NullCheckOnMutableProperty:
active: false
NullableToStringCall:
active: false
RedundantElseInWhen:
Expand Down
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
package io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.rules.bugs

import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.CodeSmell
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.Config
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.Debt
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.Entity
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.Issue
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.Rule
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.Severity
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.internal.RequiresTypeResolution
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.rules.isNonNullCheck
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.KtBinaryExpression
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.KtConstantExpression
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.KtFile
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.KtIfExpression
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.KtNameReferenceExpression
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.KtPrimaryConstructor
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.KtProperty
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi.psiUtil.containingClassOrObject
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.resolve.BindingContext
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.resolve.calls.callUtil.getResolvedCall
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.resolve.descriptorUtil.fqNameOrNull

/**
* Reports null-checks on mutable properties, as these properties' value can be
* changed - and thus make the null-check invalid - after the execution of the
* if-statement.
*
* <noncompliant>
* class A(private var a: Int?) {
* fun foo() {
* if (a != null) {
* println(2 + a!!)
* }
* }
* }
* </noncompliant>
*
* <compliant>
* class A(private val a: Int?) {
* fun foo() {
* if (a != null) {
* println(2 + a)
* }
* }
* }
* </compliant>
*
* <compliant>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that we only support one "compliant" block, can you merge both?

Suggested change
* </compliant>
*
* <compliant>
*

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code wouldn't pass the first test case proposed here, as doing so would mean the rule would have to detect both a null-check for the mutable property and a double-bang operation on the variable. This, essentially, would turn the rule into a sub-rule for UnsafeCallOnNullableType: anything that NullCheckOnMutableProperty would pick up would be picked up by that rule as well. It's not a perfectly symmetrical relationship, but I'm not sure that the use case wherein a developer wants to be warned about double-bang operations only if they're being conducted after a null-check is that prevalent.

* class A(private var a: Int?) {
* fun foo() {
* val a = a
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's not the best snippet to put in the compliant block. Is doing name shadowing and should not be suggested.

* if (a != null) {
* println(2 + a)
* }
* }
* }
* </compliant>
*/

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extra white line?

@RequiresTypeResolution
class NullCheckOnMutableProperty(config: Config) : Rule(config) {
private val mutableProperties = mutableMapOf<String?, MutableSet<String>>()
override val issue = Issue(
javaClass.simpleName,
Severity.Defect,
"Checking nullability on a mutable property is not useful because the " +
"property may be set to null afterwards.",
Debt.TEN_MINS
)

override fun visitKtFile(file: KtFile) {
if (bindingContext == BindingContext.EMPTY) return
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're missing a super.visitKtFile(file) here

super.visitKtFile(file)
mutableProperties.clear()
}

override fun visitPrimaryConstructor(constructor: KtPrimaryConstructor) {
val containerName = constructor.getContainingClassOrObject().name
constructor.valueParameters.asSequence()
.filter { it.isMutable }
.mapNotNull { it.name }
.forEach { mutableProperties.getOrPut(containerName) { mutableSetOf() }.add(it) }
super.visitPrimaryConstructor(constructor)
}

override fun visitProperty(property: KtProperty) {
if (property.isVar) {
property.name?.let { propName ->
val containerName = property.containingClassOrObject?.name.orEmpty() // A root-level property if empty.
mutableProperties.getOrPut(
containerName
) { mutableSetOf() }.add(propName)
}
}
super.visitProperty(property)
}

override fun visitIfExpression(expression: KtIfExpression) {
val condition = expression.condition
if (condition is KtBinaryExpression && condition.isNonNullCheck()) {
// Determine which of the two sides of the condition is the null constant and use the other.
if (condition.left is KtConstantExpression) {
condition.right
} else {
condition.left
}?.let {
// Only proceed with evaluating if the checked expression is for a variable.
it as? KtNameReferenceExpression
}?.let {
evaluateNameReferenceExpression(expression, it)
}
}
super.visitIfExpression(expression)
}

private fun evaluateNameReferenceExpression(
expression: KtIfExpression,
referenceExpression: KtNameReferenceExpression
) {
val resolvedCall = referenceExpression.getResolvedCall(bindingContext) ?: return
val containingDeclaration = resolvedCall.resultingDescriptor.containingDeclaration
if (
mutableProperties[containingDeclaration.fqNameOrNull()?.asString()]
?.contains(referenceExpression.text) == true
) {
report(
CodeSmell(
issue,
Entity.from(expression),
"Null-check is being called on a mutable property."
)
)
}
}
}
Expand Up @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ class PotentialBugProvider : DefaultRuleSetProvider {
MapGetWithNotNullAssertionOperator(config),
MissingPackageDeclaration(config),
MissingWhenCase(config),
NullCheckOnMutableProperty(config),
RedundantElseInWhen(config),
UnconditionalJumpStatementInLoop(config),
UnnecessaryNotNullOperator(config),
Expand Down
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
package io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.rules.bugs

import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.api.Config
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.rules.setupKotlinEnvironment
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.test.compileAndLint
import io.gitlab.arturbosch.detekt.test.compileAndLintWithContext
import org.assertj.core.api.Assertions
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.cli.jvm.compiler.KotlinCoreEnvironment
import org.spekframework.spek2.Spek
import org.spekframework.spek2.style.specification.describe

class NullCheckOnMutablePropertySpec : Spek({
setupKotlinEnvironment()

val env: KotlinCoreEnvironment by memoized()
val subject by memoized { NullCheckOnMutableProperty(Config.empty) }

describe("NullCheckOnMutableProperty Rule") {
it("should report a null-check on a mutable constructor property") {
val code = """
class A(private var a: Int?) {
fun foo() {
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a!!)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).hasSize(1)
}

it("should not report a null-check on a shadowed property") {
val code = """
class A(private var a: Int?) {
fun foo() {
val a = a
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).isEmpty()
}

it("should not report a null-check on a non-mutable constructor property") {
val code = """
class A(private val a: Int?) {
fun foo() {
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).isEmpty()
}

it("should report a null-check on a mutable class property") {
val code = """
class A {
private var a: Int? = 5
fun foo() {
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a!!)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).hasSize(1)
}

it("should not report a null-check on a non-mutable class property") {
val code = """
class A {
private val a: Int? = 5
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

private val a: Int?
  get() = 5

Maybe this could be flagged too.

fun foo() {
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).isEmpty()
}

it("should report a null-check on a mutable file property") {
val code = """
private var a: Int? = 5

class A {
fun foo() {
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a!!)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).hasSize(1)
}

it("should not report a null-check on a non-mutable file property") {
val code = """
private val a: Int? = 5

class A {
fun foo() {
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).isEmpty()
}

it("should not report a null-check when there is no binding context") {
val code = """
class A(private var a: Int?) {
fun foo() {
if (a != null) {
println(2 + a!!)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLint(code)).isEmpty()
}

it("should report a null-check when null is the first element in the if-statement") {
val code = """
class A(private var a: Int?) {
fun foo() {
if (null != a) {
println(2 + a!!)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).hasSize(1)
}

it("should not report when the if-expression has no explicit null value") {
val code = """
class A(private var a: Int?) {
fun foo() {
val otherA = null
if (a != otherA) {
println(2 + a!!)
}
}
}
"""
Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).isEmpty()
}

it("should not report a null-check on a function") {
val code = """
class A {
private fun otherFoo(): Int? {
return null
}
fun foo() {
if (otherFoo() != null) {
println(2 + otherFoo()!!)
}
}
}
"""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice to have another rule to check something like this. But it would be difficult and with lots of false positives.

Assertions.assertThat(subject.compileAndLintWithContext(env, code)).isEmpty()
}
}
})