Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

instanceOf: workaround bundler issue with process.env #3923

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

IvanGoncharov
Copy link
Member

@IvanGoncharov IvanGoncharov commented Jun 22, 2023

Big shout out to @phryneas, who managed to reproduce this issue and come up with this fix.

Fixes: #3919 #3920 #3921
Context: #3887 changed code and introced optinal chaining. globalThis.process?.env.NODE_ENV is transpiled into

(_globalThis$process = globalThis.process) === null ||
_globalThis$process === void 0
  ? void 0
  : _globalThis$process.env.NODE_ENV;

Bundlers incorrectly replace (probably RegExp) process.env.NODE_ENV with "development" resulting in:

(_globalThis$process = globalThis.process) === null ||
_globalThis$process === void 0
  ? void 0
  : _globalThis$"development";

Technically it's not a graphql issue but an issue with bundler but since it caused so much pain in comutinity this is an attempt to fix it within our codebase.

Fixes: #3919 #3920 #3921
Context: #3887 changed code and introced optinal chaining.
`globalThis.process?.env.NODE_ENV` is transpiled into
```
(_globalThis$process = globalThis.process) === null ||
_globalThis$process === void 0
  ? void 0
  : _globalThis$process.env.NODE_ENV;
```
Bundlers incorrectly replace (probably RegExp) `process.env.NODE_ENV` with `"development"` resulting in:
```
(_globalThis$process = globalThis.process) === null ||
_globalThis$process === void 0
  ? void 0
  : _globalThis$"development";
```

Technically it's not a graphql issue but an issue with bundler but since it caused so much pain in comutinity this is an attempt to fix it within our codebase.
@IvanGoncharov IvanGoncharov added the PR: bug fix 🐞 requires increase of "patch" version number label Jun 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi @IvanGoncharov, I'm @github-actions bot happy to help you with this PR 👋

Supported commands

Please post this commands in separate comments and only one per comment:

  • @github-actions run-benchmark - Run benchmark comparing base and merge commits for this PR
  • @github-actions publish-pr-on-npm - Build package from this PR and publish it on NPM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PR: bug fix 🐞 requires increase of "patch" version number
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant