Add height/width attributes to HTML source element

[dletorey]

Summary

Added browser compat data for height & width attribute on

Test results and supporting details

used npm run test to run unittests locally

• Bugzilla 1694741
• Content Issue #20927

Related issues

[queengooborg]

Hey there, thank you for your PR and welcome to BCD! I was able to confirm Chrome support based on https://chromestatus.com/feature/5737185317748736 and Firefox support from the linked bug. Could you provide sources for where "Safari 15" had come from?

Also, we can mirror Opera Android as well:

[dletorey]

Ah yes, I confirmed Safari by testing in Browserstack, I am not positive about Opera Android, I shall test and confirm when working next.
Thank you

[hamishwillee]

@dletorey I added the FF108 BCD stuff as suggestions - can you accept those please?

When are the remaining changes to get this in planned?

[bsmth]

It looks like I don't have permissions to merge the suggestions, so this can wait for @dletorey to apply.

Also @queengooborg should we be removing the flag data here per flag guidelines?

once a feature has landed in a stable browser release, the flag data quickly becomes irrelevant and may be removed from BCD

[queengooborg]

Yes, we should remove the flag data per the guidelines to help consolidate the data. Firefox 108 is only one release away!

[bsmth]

Looks good thanks 👍🏻

[hamishwillee]

EDITED: I stand by this statement, but it's not worth reverting. So for this case at least, please ignore.

Yes, we should remove the flag data per the guidelines to help consolidate the data. Firefox 108 is only one release away!

@queengooborg IMO what we should always add the flag data and use tooling to sweep through and remove the prefs when releases are made. Why?

• You're always going to have some omissions so you need to tool anyway.
• If this went in now, there would be 1 month where there would be no information on MDN about how to enable the preference and the release build doesn't have it. So we're basically "wrong" for a month.
• Its easier to revert if the feature doesn't go into a release, because the information is right there. These things get reverted sometimes so it is not a theoretical problem.

[queengooborg]

LGTM, thank you!