New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
module: port source map sorting logic from chromium #31927
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -124,3 +124,28 @@ const { readFileSync } = require('fs'); | |||||
assert.strictEqual(originalColumn, knownDecodings[column]); | ||||||
} | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
// Test that generated columns are sorted when a negative offset is | ||||||
// observed, see: https://github.com/mozilla/source-map/pull/92 | ||||||
{ | ||||||
function makeMinimalMap(generatedColumns, originalColumns) { | ||||||
return { | ||||||
sources: ['test.js'], | ||||||
// Mapping from the 0th line, 0th column of the output file to the 0th | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
// source file, 0th line, ${column}th column. | ||||||
mappings: generatedColumns.map((g, i) => `${g}AA${originalColumns[i]}`) | ||||||
.join(',') | ||||||
}; | ||||||
} | ||||||
// U = 10 | ||||||
// F = -2 | ||||||
// A = 0 | ||||||
// E = 2 | ||||||
const sourceMap = new SourceMap(makeMinimalMap( | ||||||
['U', 'F', 'F'], | ||||||
['A', 'E', 'E'] | ||||||
)); | ||||||
assert.strictEqual(sourceMap.findEntry(0, 6).originalColumn, 4); | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM. |
||||||
assert.strictEqual(sourceMap.findEntry(0, 8).originalColumn, 2); | ||||||
assert.strictEqual(sourceMap.findEntry(0, 10).originalColumn, 0); | ||||||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How much can we clean up this code? The whole iterator string iterator wrapper thing is icky to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we've diverged quite a bit form the V8 implementation at this point, introducing private fields as an example. I probably wouldn't do it in this PR, but I think you could go ahead and refactor as much as you see fit.