Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "src: simplify format in node_file.cc" #34463

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MylesBorins
Copy link
Member

This reverts commit 673f49a.

This change is breaking gulp on v14.x. Reverting so we can reland in a
way that doesn't break stuff

Refs: #33660
Refs: #34371

This reverts commit 673f49a.

This change is breaking gulp on v14.x. Reverting so we can reland in a
way that doesn't break stuff

Refs: nodejs#33660
Refs: nodejs#34371
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. labels Jul 21, 2020
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Member Author

@himself65 FYI

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Member Author

Can we please fast track so we can get this in 14.6.0

@MylesBorins MylesBorins added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Jul 21, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

… this is very surprising – it’s purely a formatting change. If this breaks gulp, then gulp is already broken, but it seems almost impossible that this change actually affects behavior in anyway.

If you are certain that this is breaking, maybe just leave the commit out of the v14.6.0 proposal?

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax this change went out in v14.5.0 and broke the gulp test suite. Reverting this change in v14.6.0 fixes it.

I'll admit that I am also surprised that this change is having that effect. Although honestly I just ran the test suite again and this revert was not fixing it... TBH I'm very confused right now and will dig in a bit more

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@MylesBorins Maybe some other change made the test suite flaky? I think that seems like a more likely cause…

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Member Author

there is definitely a change on 14.5.0 that broke gulp, perhaps this was a false positive from bisect

Running bisect again and a few more manual tests... since when I checked again this revert didn't actually fix the problem I was seeing

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Member Author

Closing as manual testing again on local machine shows gulp still failing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants