test: fix bootstrap test

[benjamingr]

I landed PR 20de5f7 through NCU and somehow this change related to another PR landed in.

I'm investigating how that happened since NCU is supposed to validate a green CI of the code on GH

This PR removes the change. I'm investigating how that happened and am utterly confused.

Edit: #36308 (comment)

Checklist

• make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
• tests and/or benchmarks are included
• documentation is changed or added
• commit message follows commit guidelines

[benjamingr]

👍 to fast track

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/34806/

[github-actions]

Commit Queue failed

- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/36418
✔  Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/36418
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title      test: fix bootstrap test (#36418)
   ⚠  Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch     benjamingr:fix-test -> nodejs:master
Labels     test
Commits    1
 - test: fix bootstrap test
Committers 1
 - Benjamin Gruenbaum 
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36418
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil 
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang 
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36418
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil 
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ✔  Last GitHub Actions successful
   ℹ  Last Full PR CI on 2020-12-06T21:53:38Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/34806/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/34806/
✔  Build data downloaded
   ✔  Last Jenkins CI successful
   ℹ  This PR was created on Sun, 06 Dec 2020 21:47:00 GMT
   ✔  Approvals: 2
   ✔  - Gireesh Punathil (@gireeshpunathil) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36418#pullrequestreview-545822681
   ✔  - Yongsheng Zhang (@ZYSzys): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/36418#pullrequestreview-545833789
   ✖  This PR needs to wait 38 more hours to land
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ✔  Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/405201532

[github-actions]

Landed in ff048bd...537da19

[Trott]

I'm investigating how that happened since NCU is supposed to validate a green CI of the code on GH

NCU only validates that the last CI is green and that no changes have landed in the PR since that CI. It will not validate that CI was run against the PR rebased against current master branch. That would be ideal, but I also imagine it would slow us waaaaay down. It probably isn't feasible until we can automate that commit queue more, which in turn isn't feasible until CI is more reliable.

[benjamingr]

Thanks @Trott that's interesting and indeed would be ideal.

I'm pretty sure this is my fault and not NCU's since after checking git reflow and my shell history what happened is:

• I wanted to squash the commit and not go through CI again for no changes.
• I pushed a change containing what I thought was a squash but somehow due to bad local state on my computer and a human error the change that wasn't supposed to be there.
• I landed with NCU - ignoring the warning (since I thought I just squashed and didn't make any changes).

In retrospect I should have instead let NCU do the squash (which I assume is safer since it fetches the commits as a patch from the PR) instead of squashing manually beforehand. I am not sure why I didn't do that - I assume just because old bad habits die hard and I'm pretty inexperienced in landing things and re-learning.

I'm just happy I caught this because it caused a lot of damage and made a hotfix.