Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump versions for k8s 1.24 #5843

Merged
merged 29 commits into from Jun 10, 2022

Conversation

asmacdo
Copy link
Member

@asmacdo asmacdo commented Jun 9, 2022

Passing off to @everettraven since I'll be out today. I will be on slack if there are any questions.

If the tests don't pass we will make this a feature branch, but for the sake of go.mod merge conflicts, lets try to avoid that if possible. IMO an admin-merge could be appropriate if the tests will be fixed quickly.

Signed-off-by: Austin Macdonald austin@redhat.com

Closes: #5833

Signed-off-by: Austin Macdonald <austin@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
@everettraven everettraven added the release-blocker This issue blocks the parent release milestone label Jun 9, 2022
@everettraven everettraven added this to the v1.22.0 milestone Jun 9, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool 🥇

Some nits;

a) we need to fix the changelog and ensure that it has only what impacts the end-users
also, changes in the scaffolds need migration steps

b) I do not think that we need/should change the Leader election here. We need to check how that will affect endusers, can we do a PR only for that?

@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

everettraven commented Jun 9, 2022

@camilamacedo86

a) we need to fix the changelog and ensure that it has only what impacts the end-users also, changes in the scaffolds need migration steps

I'll make some changes to the changelog to reflect this.

b) I do not think that we need/should change the Leader election here. We need to check how that will affect endusers, can we do a PR only for that?

Unfortunately I don't think we can do it in a separate PR as client-go/leaderelection/resourcelock that comes with v0.24.0 forces the change. My understanding is that this change should be a safe step in the migration to leases and only affect new operators and not older operators. I am open to discussing this further, but this needs to be a part of this PR.

As an extra note, our e2e tests have passed with the changes as well.

Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 9, 2022
@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

still a WIP

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 9, 2022
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 9, 2022
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 9, 2022
@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 Thanks so much for all the help with the changelog!

@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

We need to bump the OPM version in the Makefile scaffolds to be 1.23.0

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 9, 2022
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 10, 2022
@asmacdo
Copy link
Member Author

asmacdo commented Jun 10, 2022

Also fixes #5854

Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
@everettraven everettraven linked an issue Jun 10, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member Author

@asmacdo asmacdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some nits, dont hold bc of this review

changelog/fragments/k8s-1.24-bump.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryce Palmer <bpalmer@redhat.com>
@everettraven everettraven removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 10, 2022
Copy link
Member Author

@asmacdo asmacdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (I cant approve because I am the OP)

the sanity/docs job is failing due to 1 broken link: https://v1-15-x.sdk.operatorframework.io/ which does work. This is 100% just a flake, I feel comfortable doing an admin merge to keep this moving.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 10, 2022
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

/approved

Great work !!!

@everettraven everettraven merged commit 025df62 into operator-framework:master Jun 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-blocker This issue blocks the parent release milestone
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bump golang 1.17 -> 1.18
5 participants