Update fs-extra to version 2.0.0 🚀 #21
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Well then |
|
@overlookmotel can we merge this PR? |
|
Sorry, have closed this PR in favour of the latest PR from Greenkeeper and this issue: #26 @CyberiumShadow, @andyhu, @rifler, @ReFruity Would any of you be able to lend a hand with getting this done? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello lovely humans,
fs-extra just published its new version 2.0.0.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of fs-extra.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project ✨
You rock!
🌴
The new version differs by 87 commits .
fcfa5952.0.023f2b1dCHANGELOG: add issuesb34da27(Closes #344) LICENSE: update yearc010fffMerge pull request #343 from mawni/readme-add-klawsync90bd756Readme: add klaw-sync linkab644a4Merge pull request #340 from jprichardson/docsf6ee61eAdd note about walk()'s removal, recommend jprichardson/node-klaw3dc711fAdd fs-promise as fs-extra-promise alternative383a269Move API docs to seperate docs/ foldera290464Remove Node v0.12 support message from READMEfa40883Move klaw to devDepsde1d483Merge pull request #339 from jprichardson/rm-walk1f83cb0Remove walk() & walkSync()cc1aaa9Merge pull request #335 from jprichardson/move-tests80ec80dMerge pull request #334 from jprichardson/move-cleanupThere are 87 commits in total. See the full diff.
This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡
greenkeeper upgrade