Upgrade Jest from 27 to 29.5.0 #47388
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I think what we could do is cherry-pick that change into the fork, that would be quicker than updating to a newer version as that requires more work and a lot of testing. |
That would be awesome. The issue is that Jest's |
Cool! I'll find some time to cherry-pick that and bump the Reanimated version, I'll let you know once it is ready 👍 |
This was referenced Jan 26, 2023
jsnajdr
force-pushed
the
update/jest-29
branch
from
da91d40
to
9bb437b
Compare
|
Hey @jsnajdr 👋 I'm working on a draft PR that will update the Reanimated version. In the meantime, you could try pointing to this version and see if this issue is resolved. Thanks! |
gziolo
added
[Package] Scripts
|
Hey there 👋 The Reanimated update is now merged in |
jsnajdr
force-pushed
the
update/jest-29
branch
2 times, most recently
from
db6b79b
to
047dd5d
Compare
Thanks for the update @geriux, it really fixed a lot of failures in this branch. Turns out we need to cherry-pick one more patch for export * as default from './Animated';This syntax is however not supported without an extra Babel plugin, so we need to rewrite it to: import * as Animated from './Animated';
export default Animated;In the upstream |
jsnajdr
force-pushed
the
update/jest-29
branch
from
047dd5d
to
99bfa7f
Compare
|
Size Change: 0 B Total Size: 1.34 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
jsnajdr
force-pushed
the
update/jest-29
branch
from
5373ac3
to
5353037
Compare
|
Flaky tests detected in 3269e11cc6f542310d2edd5caea67527cb2578e1. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/4362681327
|
jsnajdr
force-pushed
the
update/jest-29
branch
3 times, most recently
from
0529a8e
to
d2d52d3
Compare
jsnajdr
requested review from
kevin940726,
ajitbohra and
gziolo
as code owners
|
I did some final updates for the PR:
@tyxla @gziolo If the CI checks come back as green, could you do a final review of this upgrade? |
gziolo
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. I don't have the knowledge to review some of the changes related to React Native and the custom resolver that seems to be targeting ES Modules in node_modules. However, everything is green on CI and the part for the web looks excellent. Great work on that upgrade!
| @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ module.exports = { | |||
| '**/?(*.)test.[jt]s?(x)', | |||
| ], | |||
| testPathIgnorePatterns: [ '/node_modules/', '<rootDir>/vendor/' ], | |||
| timers: 'real', | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should also update the README to reflect it:
This works around an issue where the new Jest tries to use the The fixes I did were inspired by this very thoughtful comment in another project that did the Jest 29 upgrade last year: microsoft/accessibility-insights-web#5421 (comment) |
|
After merge, CI checks are failing because |
Most likely nothing to worry about. It often happens after updating the lock file. I believe it's a cache issue and restarting failed jobs helps. See #33424 for some similar issues in the past. |
Happy to hear that 🙂 Locally, running |
2 tasks
|
Updated my |
|
Hi @ktmn 👋 You're running into an issue with https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/blob/trunk/test/unit/scripts/resolver.js#L10-L22 One way how to solve it is to upgrade If that doesn't work, we should probably include the custom Jest resolver that works around these issues in the Jest config for |
thelovekesh
added a commit
to ampproject/amp-wp
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
thelovekesh
added a commit
to ampproject/amp-wp
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an upgrade of Jest from v27 to v29, two major versions up. There's been a lot of breaking changes, so it's a big and difficult PR.
At this moment, web unit tests are all green, mobile tests still need some fixing.
One thing that's broken in mobile tests are Jest helpers imported from
react-native-reanimated. Gutenberg uses a fork ofreact-native-reanimated. For the Jest update, we need to incorporate changes from this PR: software-mansion/react-native-reanimated#3559. @geriux would it be possible to update the fork? Currently the fork is based on upstream version 2.9.1 (Jul 2022), the Jest helper issue (expect.extend) has been fixed in version 2.13.0 (Nov 2022) and the latest version is 2.14.4 (Jan 2022, two weeks ago)