New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove chosen deprecations #10063
Remove chosen deprecations #10063
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10063 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.53% 85.55% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 333 333
Lines 13473 13460 -13
==========================================
- Hits 11524 11516 -8
+ Misses 1949 1944 -5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
It might be worth updating the "Deprecations" documentation as well to avoid confusion? |
It'll be re-added in context of v3
It'll be re-added in context of v3
It'll be re-added in context of v3, with more hacky approach to `deploy -f` support
357b55d
to
b5f9076
Compare
Good point totally forgot about that. Added now |
b5f9076
to
c146168
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call with documenting it in deprecations.md
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Remove deprecations we agreed internally to not apply for v3
configValidationMode
settingsls deploy -f
as an alias forsls deploy function -f
package.include
andpackage.exclude
Additionally replaced a resource extension-related deprecation with an error, as it was a logical error to place deprecation there. Deprecation signaled a situation where there was an attempt to extend not existing resource, and that resulted in adding resource without
Type
property, Such setup fails immediately with AWS validation. Replaced that with more meaningful error on our side.