Skip to content

20210804 Dev Meeting

Hamish Willee edited this page Aug 5, 2021 · 11 revisions

Agenda

General:

Notes

  • common: allow negative temperatures for ESC_INFO message #1663 - WIP message - are we OK with this?

    • James: What is use case for negative ESC temperatures - low temperature can only improve performance?
      • Claudio: It is inconsistent with other message temperature reporting and looks odd in GCS to clamp temp low. It is being used in certification to report temperatures.
      • James - that is not a justification: the measurement is not calibrated, so can't be used for certification, even if reported.
      • James - not opposed (not using it). Option is to use bitfield to indicate a value is negative.
    • As WIP it can be broken in theory but this is a compatibility break for ROS. Contact ROS and original author to let them know.
    • HamishW. Post meeting change of opinion from me here: https://github.com/mavlink/mavlink/pull/1663#pullrequestreview-722842830
  • add MAV_CMD_DO_ADSB_OUT_IDENT #1662 - thoughts?

  • param FTP - also see https://github.com/ArduPilot/ardupilot/pull/13911

    • JamesP: Heads up that ArduPilot is planning to PR a MAVFTP-based mechanism for updating parameters into MAVLink.
    • HamishW: Bar for inclusion is same as anything else.
    • JulianO: Awesome. Might solve a lot of problems, e.g. MISSION_CHECKSUM not particularly needed if you use this approach.
  • Discussion of stuff happening in MAVSDK re plugins that allow autopilot-side implementations and "shims"

    • Servers is not a great name!
    • Julian to create basic docs and cross link. Seb hopes to provide detail towards end of his project.

Follow ups

  • VTOL Safe Area - RomanB
    • JamesP - Roman did not follow up with issue yet. Raised in ArduPilot - not much impact yet.
    • Discuss once Roman raises issue. Hamish to ping.
  • TIMESYNC -
    • Julian is going to add creating new message to his list.
  • Fix up enum generation - reminder. James still considering best way forward for this, but understands its importance.
  • Common calibration protocol(s)? https://github.com/mavlink/mavlink/issues/1660#issuecomment-888046086
    • Generally "yes this would be good to have". Daniel started discussion at some point.
    • Not sure what appetite there would be to actually make the changes though.
    • AO hamish to gather more information on what different stacks can do and re-raise for further discussion.

Not discussed

Attendees: JulianOes, JamesP, Seb, HamishW, ClaudioM

Clone this wiki locally